In 1985, the state of Nevada passed its first “anti-device” law, making computer play, hidden video camera play, etc., illegal for blackjack players. This law was immediately criticized by attorneys as being unconstitutional due to its “vagueness.”
When a blackjack player by the name of Philip Anderson was busted for using a concealed computer in a Las Vegas casino shortly after the anti-device law went into effect, the law was challenged in court. And it was challenged on the basis of its being unconstitutional precisely because it was too vague. To no one’s surprise, the player won his case. The judge acknowledged that the law was simply too vague to be legitimate. (more…)

